Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01275
Original file (BC 2013 01275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01275

	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her nonselection for promotion to the grade of major while 
assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) be removed.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reason surrounding her nonselection for promotion to the 
grade of major is unclear; however, she believes it is because 
the selection board was not aware of her Master’s Degree or 
Squadron Officer School (SOS) that she completed while on active 
duty.  

She was advised that she had been passed-over twice while being 
interviewed for a Bioenvironmental Engineering position vacancy 
with the Montana Air National Guard (MT ANG).  

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement and copies of her transcript for completion of her 
Master’s Degree (MS Degree) program and SOS. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was considered, but not selected, for promotion to 
the grade of major by the Calendar Year 2010 (CY10) and the 
CY11 Line and Nonline Nonparticipating Reserve (NPR) Major 
Promotion Selection Boards, that convened 31 Jan 10 and 23 Jan 
11, respectively.  The quota for nonparticipating major boards 
was one (1) for each board.

On 1 Oct 11, the applicant was discharged under the provisions 
of Title 10, United States Code 14505 and 14513 for two 
nonselections for promotion to the grade of major.  

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/PB recommends denial, stating in part, that while there may 
have been an error in the applicant’s advanced academic 
education information, in accordance with AFI 36-2504, 
Promotion, Continuation, and Selective Early Removal in the 
Reserve of the Air Force, paragraph 1.7., it was her 
responsibility to update that data and ensure it was current 
before her record was considered by each board.  

In addition, the applicant was assigned to the IRR from 11 Jan 
07 through 30 May 11.  During this time she completed her 
military service obligation and her 3 year contractual 
commitment for accepting separation pay (Title 10 U.S.C. Section 
1174).  On 31 May 11, she was assigned to the Inactive Status 
List Reserve Section (ISLRS), and discharged effective 
1 Oct 11 for being nonselected twice for promotion (Title 
10 U.S.C. Section 14505 and 14513).  A review of the applicant's 
Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Officer Selection Briefs 
(OSB) reveals that the Masters of Science Degree was not 
reflected in her record, while the completion of Basic 
Developmental Education was reflected in her record.  Upon 
completion of an academic degree, the member must supply HQ Air 
Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) a transcript from the 
university that conferred the degree.  Only HQ AFIT can update 
this information.

The complete PB evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant notes that, “To be clear, it is necessary that 
just one "non-select" be removed from her military records in 
order to make her eligible for commissioning into the Air 
National Guard.

She will promptly provide her official transcripts to the 
appropriate office at AFIT and update her records to reflect the 
completion of her master's degree.  She discovered this error 
just recently while in the final stages of hiring by the MT ANG. 
Until this point, it seemed reasonable to conclude that AFIT 
would have a record of a degree she completed while on active 
duty and assigned to AFIT itself.  She submitted a request to 
have her official graduate school transcript sent to the AFIT 
Academic Coding Branch to correct her previous oversight.

It is her strong desire to serve again as an officer in the MT 
ANG and there is a vacant position for which she is qualified. 
She urges the Board to consider taking the actions included in 
Paragraph 5 of the Air Force Reserve evaluation to remove one 
nonselection to major from her records so that she might have 
this opportunity. 

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We note that 
the applicant requests her nonselection to the grade of major be 
removed; however, as pointed out by ARPC/PB, it was the 
applicant’s responsibility to ensure her records were current 
and we do not find that she exercised due diligence in ensuring 
her records were current and up to date.  Therefore, we agree 
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice.  .  In view of the foregoing and in the 
absence of sufficient persuasive evidence to the contrary, we 
find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2013-01275 in Executive Session on 27 Jan 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Mar 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/PB, undated.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Apr 13.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Apr 13.




                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02947

    Original file (BC 2013 02947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NPR has a promotion opportunity of one (1) at each board. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2013-02947 in Executive Session on 15 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jun 13, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03007

    Original file (BC-2013-03007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03007 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His nonselections for promotion to the grade of major while assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) be removed. The applicant has provided no evidence that the board's recommendations were in any way unfair or unjust. A review of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02322

    Original file (BC-2012-02322.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her non-selection for promotion to the grade of major by the Calendar Year 2012 (CY12) Nonparticipating Reserve Nurse Corps Major Promotion Selection Board, be removed from her record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00089

    Original file (BC 2013 00089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00089 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His non-selection for promotion to the grade of major (O-4) in the Calendar Year (CY) 2012 Individual Ready Reserves (IRR) Major Selection Board be removed from his records. In response to the applicant’s DD Form 149 requesting his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02059

    Original file (BC 2014 02059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. When considered by the CY11 and CY12 Nonparticipating Reserve Major Promotion Selection Board, the applicant was assigned to the Nonobligated Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00914

    Original file (BC-2012-00914.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00914 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Remove her non-selections for promotion to the grade of major (0- 4) from her records. The applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB), dated 25 Jan 11, reflects no errors. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 12.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02838

    Original file (BC 2013 02838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends he did not have sufficient time to prepare and be competitive for his major selection board. The applicant contends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02952

    Original file (BC 2014 02952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Jun 14, she received notification she was non-selected for promotion to major for the second time. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00301

    Original file (BC-2003-00301.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00301 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to major by special selection board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1997C (CY97C) Central Major Selection Board, with the information that he completed an advanced...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03409

    Original file (BC 2013 03409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial of the applicant's request to remove the CY12 nonselection from her record. Through no fault of the applicant, her record was incomplete at the time she was considered by the selection board in question, in that four of her United States Marine Corps (USMC) evaluations (FitReps) were not...